TikTok Sparks Debate Over 150 Baht Coconut Price in Phuket
- Apr 23
- 2 min read
A foreign TikTok user has ignited a lively online discussion after criticizing the price of a coconut purchased in Phuket.

The incident took place on April 22 at Patong Beach, where the man shared a video on his account, @rk.k1ng. In the clip, he showed a coconut he said cost him 150 baht and expressed frustration, noting that a similar drink would cost only around 25 baht in his home country.
Speaking partly in Thai, the TikToker emphasized that he found the price excessive, even using strong language to underline his point. His post quickly gained traction, drawing a wide range of reactions from both Thai and international viewers.

Many Thai users criticized the man, arguing that he willingly paid the price and should not complain afterward. Some comments questioned his decision-making, while others suggested that if he found local prices too high, he could simply avoid buying such items.
At the same time, several foreign users supported his view, noting that prices in major tourist hotspots across Thailand are often significantly higher than in local markets. One commenter mentioned paying even more for a coconut at an airport, highlighting the broader issue of tourist-area pricing.
Local users also joined the discussion by explaining the economics behind such pricing. They pointed out that vendors operating in popular destinations face higher expenses, including rent and logistics, which are reflected in retail prices. Others countered that coconuts themselves are very cheap at the source—sometimes costing just a few baht—arguing that markups by intermediaries and sellers can be excessive.

Amid the heated debate, some voices called for more respectful dialogue, criticizing the harsh tone of certain comments directed at the foreign visitor. They stressed that concerns over pricing should be addressed constructively, without turning into personal attacks.
As of now, authorities in Phuket have not commented on the situation, and no official review of pricing practices in tourist areas has been announced.



Comments